As I promised in Part 1, and Part 2, I would continue to dig, learn, communicate, and pass on the helpful info I find in this process.
For those like myself, already invested in a Husqvarna GT/ TS (including Craftsman GT6000 and other group brands with same chassis), not much to say, but we bought it and there is hope to turn your machine into an actual LGT, (light for possible electric actuators but not hydraulics for the purpose of this thread). They sure are good looking machines, arne't they?
After I finally got a working mans knowledge of the warranty, I figured there is hope here too for some with the desire, means, or connections, with the idea that what you do will only help the rest of us.
I went to the trouble of hiring an engineer in the field of Agriculture Fabrication (structural and mechanical) to examine the pan style chassis and develop a plan that would transform the chassis into a capable, solid LGT for Johnny Bucket jr specifically, and I documented the process in Part 2.
Their opinion on that chassis is that it is not engineered for anything that would work the ground, as in, it is not hardened steel, the frame comes from the factory out of square (in the failed area, at least the new one came that way, the same frame by part number on the new TS), it is not truly a one-piece stamped frame because it relies on bolts on both ends to reinforce it verses a weld that would be more supportive, the bolts are self tapping (not grade 8) that go into pressed in sleeves, was not truly 12 ga (a metric number that was more like 13 ga + plus the thin e-coat was 12 ga). There was more but that's enough for countering Husqvarna's claimed nonsense.
If you are a potential Husqvarna customer that is trying to decide for the purpose of normal use as a garden tractor, Husqvarna or their other badges, then hopefully this will help you, while you consider facts verses opinions on the tractor, attachments you want to use, and the warranty.
It is may hope that GT/ TS customers of Husqvarna are well informed when they buy, which is more than I can say for the rest of us. I also hope to communicate through compassion, and accuracy, Who-What-Where-When-Why-How, this happened, through or with the rest of us, and where to go from here.
With all sincerity, I believe it is up to we the consumer now to help one another, because the industry would rather pay Madison Avenue to positively shape public perception creating substance in virtual reality, than pay out of their budgeted after sales liability to reciprocate consumer loyalty, cultivating a real product and brand that can perform what is claimed in the real world, or at least just be honest.
I will start with the Husqvarna Warranty and the Magnuson-Moss Act that minimally regulates the warranty.
I feel I still have to preface this with every one of these, I want Husqvarna to publicly apologize for their combative treatment of me, my wife, and the other customers like us, to include their support of a Dealer that was rude to my wife, deceptive, and unethical in their business practices (part 1, the story that started my commitment).
I will have several entries here, so much information. But this is the first.






For those like myself, already invested in a Husqvarna GT/ TS (including Craftsman GT6000 and other group brands with same chassis), not much to say, but we bought it and there is hope to turn your machine into an actual LGT, (light for possible electric actuators but not hydraulics for the purpose of this thread). They sure are good looking machines, arne't they?
After I finally got a working mans knowledge of the warranty, I figured there is hope here too for some with the desire, means, or connections, with the idea that what you do will only help the rest of us.
I went to the trouble of hiring an engineer in the field of Agriculture Fabrication (structural and mechanical) to examine the pan style chassis and develop a plan that would transform the chassis into a capable, solid LGT for Johnny Bucket jr specifically, and I documented the process in Part 2.
Their opinion on that chassis is that it is not engineered for anything that would work the ground, as in, it is not hardened steel, the frame comes from the factory out of square (in the failed area, at least the new one came that way, the same frame by part number on the new TS), it is not truly a one-piece stamped frame because it relies on bolts on both ends to reinforce it verses a weld that would be more supportive, the bolts are self tapping (not grade 8) that go into pressed in sleeves, was not truly 12 ga (a metric number that was more like 13 ga + plus the thin e-coat was 12 ga). There was more but that's enough for countering Husqvarna's claimed nonsense.
If you are a potential Husqvarna customer that is trying to decide for the purpose of normal use as a garden tractor, Husqvarna or their other badges, then hopefully this will help you, while you consider facts verses opinions on the tractor, attachments you want to use, and the warranty.
It is may hope that GT/ TS customers of Husqvarna are well informed when they buy, which is more than I can say for the rest of us. I also hope to communicate through compassion, and accuracy, Who-What-Where-When-Why-How, this happened, through or with the rest of us, and where to go from here.
With all sincerity, I believe it is up to we the consumer now to help one another, because the industry would rather pay Madison Avenue to positively shape public perception creating substance in virtual reality, than pay out of their budgeted after sales liability to reciprocate consumer loyalty, cultivating a real product and brand that can perform what is claimed in the real world, or at least just be honest.
I will start with the Husqvarna Warranty and the Magnuson-Moss Act that minimally regulates the warranty.
I feel I still have to preface this with every one of these, I want Husqvarna to publicly apologize for their combative treatment of me, my wife, and the other customers like us, to include their support of a Dealer that was rude to my wife, deceptive, and unethical in their business practices (part 1, the story that started my commitment).
I will have several entries here, so much information. But this is the first.





