Before I start the updates I want to point out a couple things so they make sense.
When I said “multiple times before” in reference to use of the scoop, more specifically approx 35-38 hrs of use, near as we can figure. If anyone is thinking about one of these scoops from the many manufacturers, other than the basic structural requirements (I will go into some of this in the build), I’ll pass on that it was useless with the stock 2ply turf tires and weight of the tractor. (I want to point out I think soil makes a difference too).
Each time I added another piece (including the Lugs that were recommended by the Dealer) of weight and traction the tractor came to life and was more usable. The weights and torque, load, placed on the tractor were still under the specs of Tuff Torq K66 with manual (electric switch) locking axle and inline with the recommendations of the Dealer and the other competitive brands to include Craftsman.
As a note, The Dealer is also the one that installed the Lugs they recommended on the extra Husqvarna rear wheels I bought through the Dealer so I could easily change from turf to lugs depending on the work. They commented to me that first month that no-one has ever done that before, yet it made sense to me. This is also an important fact when weighing against Husqvarna’s laughable response.
Consider this second bit of info too;
I believe it comes down to a certain measurement of wheel torque being applied to the ground for a certain measure of work with the given dimensions of the scoop including the forces against the tractor at any given time in this process. Am I making sense? I’m sure others out there can word this better.
Without going into too much detail, a muscle car with say a 500hp, (1hp being a measure of 550 lbs being lifted 1ft in 1 sec, or there about) 500ft lbs of torque motor (torque being the measure of lbs in ft per sec of work or actual force applied, or there about) that is doing the classic burnout or exhibition of pure force on pavement, if connected to a cable type scale from the rear to a fixed location might read a few pounds in that moment, not 500lbs. The reason for the discrepancy is that the wheels in that moment are not applying the 500ft lbs of maximum torque the motor is capable of developing because the wheels are spinning and no force is actually measurable against that fixed location.
I’m trying to point out these facts I believe are applicable to understanding why I believe some of the more pertinent answers from Husqvarna are to put it kindly, laughable! Or just plain insulting to their customers, because I’m just one of many.
Husqvarna has compelled me in their complete lack of respect, and deceptive practices to put the effort (I’m a “quiet professional” in my field of work) into dissecting, analyzing, collecting, and readying for public view, everything I can about their business practice surrounding their Garden Tractors that aren’t, and how their Garden Tractor is actually built.
Lets be clear, I will not by my own hand remove this statement, ever.
I do not want any money from Husqvarna, in any capacity, from any representatives, period. Their is nothing that husqvarna can ever do for me at this point, but to come clean, apologize, and rethink their current business model that is unsustainable. In other words Husqvarna, KEEP YOUR WORD. I do know that there are Husqvarna employees on these forums, don’t know which specifically because they have been too afraid to come out in the open (being honest as I have, but I have some ideas) and have an honest discussion of their official warranty denial response. They refuse to talk to me.
If Husqvarna called me up and said let us comp your new frame (reimburse me) I would deny it and ask for public apology for myself and anyone else who bought a GT/TS from them thinking they would honor the warranty when using it as a Garden Tractor. Selling a customer on a warranty is a powerful way to close a sale with a customer on the fence.
I would also make all conversations public to include the ones they want private (because I will not agree to any non-disclosure agreements, but private names will be kept private), as proof, I will post the response I was given (without my colorful responses to it). I will also give the response I was given in a separate update with my colorful responses (admittedly not making me look great necessarily but for being honest). My credibility both private and professional is my identity, and as things go is most important. I can make mistakes, get information wrong, but can also be held accountable voluntarily, unlike Husqvarna. This is my Statement, done.